sciresНаучные исследования экономического факультета. Электронный журналScientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal2078-3809Moscow State University10.38050/2078-3809-2019-11-4-19-34scires-135Research ArticleКОНКУРЕНТНАЯ И ПРОМЫШЛЕННАЯ ПОЛИТИКАCOMPETITION AND INDUSTRIAL POLICYОсобенности конкурентных стратегий авиакомпаний с учетом тарифообразованияTariff Setting within Airlines Competitive StrategiesМарковаО. А.MarkovaO. A.

Маркова Ольга Анатольевна, младший научный сотрудник  

Центр исследований конкуренции и экономического регулирования

Москва

Olga A. Markova,  Junior Research Assistant  

Center for Research in Competition and Economic Regulation Studies  

Moscow

olya.eule@gmail.comМелешкинаА. И.MeleshkinaA. I.

Мелешкина Анна Игоревна, научный сотрудник  

Центр исследований конкуренции и экономического регулирования

Москва

Anna I. Meleshkina,  Research Assistant  

Center for Research in Competition and Economic Regulation Studies  

Moscow

ann.meleshkina@mail.ruМоросановаА. А.MorosanovaA. A.

Моросанова Анастасия Андреевна,  научный сотрудник  

Экономический факультет МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова,

Центр исследований конкуренции и экономического регулирования  РАНХиГС

Москва

Anastasia A. Morosanova,  Research Assistant

Faculty of EconomicsLomonosov Moscow State University,  

Center for Research in Competition and Economic Regulation Studies   RANEPA

Moscow

nastya.komkova@gmail.comРАНХиГСРоссияRANEPARussian FederationМГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова; РАНХиГСРоссияLomonosov Moscow State University; RANEPARussian Federation2019281220191141934Copyright © Маркова О.А., Мелешкина А.И., Моросанова А.А., 20192019Маркова О.А., Мелешкина А.И., Моросанова А.А.Markova O.A., Meleshkina A.I., Morosanova A.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://scires.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/135

Бизнес-стратегия авиакомпании определяет конкурентоспособность услуг авиаперевозчика, однако также может нести антимонопольные риски дискриминации и злоупотребления доминирующим положением. В исследовании описаны особенности организации отрасли пассажирских авиаперевозок (как на уровне перевозчиков, так и на уровне аэропортов), которые позволяют выделить группы бизнес-моделей авиакомпаний, что является необходимым для последующего анализа рисков ухудшения условий конкуренции на рынках авиаперевозок. В статье также проводится сопоставительный анализ аэропортовых тарифов РФ в привязке к возможностям аэропортов стимулировать конкуренцию между авиакомпаниями. В заключении сформулированы основные проблемы сферы пассажирских авиаперевозок РФ в контексте конкурентной политики.  

The airline business strategy determines the competitiveness of the airline services but may also bear antitrust risks of discrimination and abuse of dominance. The study describes the features of the passenger air transportation industry (both at the carrier level and at the airport level), which allow to distinguish groups of airline business models. This is necessary for the subsequent analysis of antitrust risks in the air transportation markets. The article also provides a comparative analysis of the airport tariffs in the Russian Federation in relation to the ability of airports to stimulate competition between airlines. In conclusion the main problems of the passenger air transportation sector of the Russian Federation in the context of competition policy are formulated.  

конкуренцияавиакомпаниятарифысетевые модели авиаперевозокcompetitionairlinetariffsairline networks modelsReferencesBerry S. Estimation of a Model of Entry in the Airline Industry // Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. – 1992. – Vol. 60. – No. 4.Berry S. Estimation of a Model of Entry in the Airline Industry // Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. – 1992. – Vol. 60. – No. 4.Borenstein S. Hubs and high fares: dominance and market power in the US airline industry // The RAND Journal of Economics. – 1989. – Vol. 20. – No. 3.Borenstein S. Hubs and high fares: dominance and market power in the US airline industry // The RAND Journal of Economics. – 1989. – Vol. 20. – No. 3.Button K. Airline network economics // In D. Jenkins (Ed.). Handbook of airline economics (2nd ed.). – New York: Aviation Week/McGraw-Hill, 2002.Button K. Airline network economics // In D. Jenkins (Ed.). Handbook of airline economics (2nd ed.). – New York: Aviation Week/McGraw-Hill, 2002.Committee on Appropriations Hearings before a subcommittee of the committee on appropriations united states senate one hundred fifth congress first and second sessions, 1998. – URL: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-105shrg53117/html/CHRG-105shrg53117.htmCommittee on Appropriations Hearings before a subcommittee of the committee on appropriations united states senate one hundred fifth congress first and second sessions, 1998. – URL: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-105shrg53117/html/CHRG-105shrg53117.htmCook G., Goodwin J. Comparison of Hub-and-Spoke and Point-to-Point Systems // Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education and Research. – 2008. – Vol. 17. – No. 2.Cook G., Goodwin J. Comparison of Hub-and-Spoke and Point-to-Point Systems // Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education and Research. – 2008. – Vol. 17. – No. 2.Dempsey P. Predation, Competition and Antitrust Law: Turbulence in the Airline Industry // Journal of Air Law and Commerce. – 2002. – Vol. 67. – No. 3.Dempsey P. Predation, Competition and Antitrust Law: Turbulence in the Airline Industry // Journal of Air Law and Commerce. – 2002. – Vol. 67. – No. 3.Elzinga K., Mills D. Predatory pricing in the airline industry: Spirit Airlines v. Northwest Airlines // The Antitrust Revolution. – 5th Edition, ed. by J. Kwoka and L. White, 2005.Elzinga K., Mills D. Predatory pricing in the airline industry: Spirit Airlines v. Northwest Airlines // The Antitrust Revolution. – 5th Edition, ed. by J. Kwoka and L. White, 2005.Ferrer-Rosell B., Coenders G. Airline type and tourist expenditure: Are full service and low cost carriers converging or diverging? // Journal of Air Transport Management. – 2017. – Vol. 63.Ferrer-Rosell B., Coenders G. Airline type and tourist expenditure: Are full service and low cost carriers converging or diverging? // Journal of Air Transport Management. – 2017. – Vol. 63.Gatignon H., Anderson E., Helsen K. Competitive reactions to market entry: Explaining interfirm differences // Journal of Marketing Research. – 1989. – Vol. 26. – No. 1.Gatignon H., Anderson E., Helsen K. Competitive reactions to market entry: Explaining interfirm differences // Journal of Marketing Research. – 1989. – Vol. 26. – No. 1.Goolsbee A., Syverson C. How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? Evidence from the major airlines // The Quarterly journal of economics. – 2008. – Vol. 123. – No. 4.Goolsbee A., Syverson C. How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? Evidence from the major airlines // The Quarterly journal of economics. – 2008. – Vol. 123. – No. 4.Ito H., Lee D. Incumbent responses to lower cost entry: evidence from the US airline industry // Working Paper No. 2003-22Ito H., Lee D. Incumbent responses to lower cost entry: evidence from the US airline industry // Working Paper No. 2003-22Brown University Department of Economics Paper. Marti L., Puertas R., Calafat C. Efficiency of airlines: Hub and Spoke versus Point-to-Point // Journal of economic studies. – 2015. – Vol. 42. – No. 1.Brown University Department of Economics Paper. Marti L., Puertas R., Calafat C. Efficiency of airlines: Hub and Spoke versus Point-to-Point // Journal of economic studies. – 2015. – Vol. 42. – No. 1.Reichmuth J. Airline Business Models. Topical Report, 2008. – URL: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/modes/air/doc/abm_report_2008.pdfReichmuth J. Airline Business Models. Topical Report, 2008. – URL: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/modes/air/doc/abm_report_2008.pdfShaked A., Sutton J. Natural oligopolies // Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. – 1983. – Vol. 51. – No. 5.Shaked A., Sutton J. Natural oligopolies // Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. – 1983. – Vol. 51. – No. 5.Zgodavova Z., Rozenberg R., Szabo S. Analysis of Point-to-Point versus Hub-and-Spoke airline networks // XIII International Scientific Conference-New Trends in Aviation Development (NTAD). IEEE, 2018.Zgodavova Z., Rozenberg R., Szabo S. Analysis of Point-to-Point versus Hub-and-Spoke airline networks // XIII International Scientific Conference-New Trends in Aviation Development (NTAD). IEEE, 2018.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.