<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">scires</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Научные исследования экономического факультета. Электронный журнал</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2078-3809</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Moscow State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.38050/2078-3809-2025-17-4-35-56</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">scires-422</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ВОПРОСЫ ТЕОРИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THEORETICAL ISSUES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Как изучать экономический дискурс (анализ важнейших подходов)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>How to Study Economic Discourse (An Analysis of the Most Important Approaches).</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Калинина</surname><given-names>О. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kalinina</surname><given-names>O. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Калинина Ольга Сергеевна, инженер 2-ой категории, экономический факультет</p><p>г. Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Olga S. Kalinina, Engineer of the 2nd category, Faculty of Economics Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">olgakalinina.msu@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>35</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Калинина О.С., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Калинина О.С.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kalinina O.S.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://scires.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/422">https://scires.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/422</self-uri><abstract><p>Данная статья посвящена комплексному обзору основных методологических подходов, применяемых в исследованиях экономического дискурса, их плюсам и минусам. В работе аргументируется, что понимание экономического дискурса имеет критическое значение для анализа влияния экономических идей на формирование государственной политики и общественное мнение. Подчеркивается, что наиболее эффективным способом изучения экономического дискурса является интеграция различных методологических подходов – науковедческого, социологической и количественного, что позволяет нивелировать их недостатки и получить более полное и объективное понимание сложной и многогранной природы экономического дискурса и его влияния на экономическую реальность.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article is devoted to a comprehensive review of the main methodological approaches used in the research of economic discourse, their pros and cons. The paper argues that understanding economic discourse is critically important for analyzing the impact of economic ideas on the formation of public policy and public opinion. It is emphasized that the most effective way to study economic discourse is to integrate various methodological approaches – scientific, sociological and quantitative which makes it possible to eliminate their shortcomings and gain a more complete and objective understanding of the complex and multifaceted nature of economic discourse and its impact on economic reality.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>экономический дискурс</kwd><kwd>методология</kwd><kwd>науковедение</kwd><kwd>социология экономики</kwd><kwd>количественный анализ</kwd><kwd>эволюция экономических идей</kwd><kwd>экономическая политика</kwd><kwd>риторика</kwd><kwd>народная экономическая теория.</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>economic discourse</kwd><kwd>methodology</kwd><kwd>scientific studies</kwd><kwd>sociology of economics</kwd><kwd>quantitative analysis</kwd><kwd>evolution of economic ideas</kwd><kwd>economic policy</kwd><kwd>rhetoric</kwd><kwd>national economic theory.</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Боррадори Д. Американский философ: Беседы с Куайном, Дэвидсоном, Патнэмом, Нозиком, Данто, Рорти, Кейвлом, МакИнтайром, Куном. М.: Дом интеллектуальной книги, Гнозис, 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Borradori D. Amerikanskiy filosof: Besedy s Kuaynom, Devidsonom, Patnemom, Nozikom, Danto, Rorti, Keyvlom, MakIntayrom, Kunom. M.: Dom intellektual'noy knigi, Gnozis, 1998. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вольчик В.В., Маслюкова Е.В. Нарративы, идеи и институты // Terra economicus. 2018. Т. 16. № 2. С. 150–168.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vol'chik V.V., Maslyukova E.V. Narrativy, idei i instituty. Terra economicus. 2018. T. 16. № 2. S. 150–168. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Измайлов А.А. Предметная идентификация новой институциональной экономической теории: методология научно-исследовательских программ. Дисс. … канд. эк. наук. М., 2023.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Izmaylov A.A. Predmetnaya identifikatsiya novoy institutsional'noy ekonomicheskoy teorii: metodologiya nauchno-issledovatel'skikh programm. Diss. … kand. ek. nauk. M., 2023. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лакатос И. Доказательства и опровержения. Как доказываются теоремы. Пер. И.Н. Веселовского. М.: Наука, 1967.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lakatos I. Dokazatel'stva i oproverzheniya. Kak dokazyvayutsya teoremy. Per. I.N. Veselovskogo. M.: Nauka, 1967. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лакатос И. Фальсификация и методология научно-исследовательских программ. М.: Медиум, 1995.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lakatos I. Fal'sifikatsiya i metodologiya nauchno-issledovatel'skikh programm. M.: Medium, 1995. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лакатос И. История науки и ее рациональные реконструкции // Кун Т. Структура научных революций. М.: АСТ, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lakatos I. Istoriya nauki i ee ratsional'nye rekonstruktsii. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy. M.: AST, 2001. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лакатос И. Избранные произведения по философии и методологии науки. М.: Академический Проект, 2008.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lakatos I. Izbrannye proizvedeniya po filosofii i metodologii nauki. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2008. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Либман А. Современная экономическая теория: основные тенденции // Вопросы экономики. 2007. № 3. С. 36–54.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Libman  A.  Sovremennaya  ekonomicheskaya  teoriya:  osnovnye  tendentsii.  Voprosy ekonomiki. 2007. № 3. S. 36–54. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мальцев А.А. Гетеродоксальная экономическая теория: текущее состояние и пути дальнейшего развития // Экономическая политика. 2018. Т. 13. № 2. С. 148–169.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mal'tsev A.A. Geterodoksal'naya ekonomicheskaya teoriya: tekushchee sostoyanie i puti dal'neyshego razvitiya. Ekonomicheskaya politika. 2018. T. 13. № 2. S. 148–169. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Микулинский С.Р., Мирский Э.М. Науковедение // Большая советская энциклопедия. 3е изд. Т. 17. М.: Советская энциклопедия, 1974. С. 331–332.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mikulinskiy S.R., Mirskiy E.M. Naukovedenie. Bol'shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya. 3-e izd. T. 17. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1974. S. 331–332.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кейнс Д.М. Общая теория занятости, процента и денег. М.: Прогресс, 1978.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keyns D.M. Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg. M.: Progress, 1978. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кошовец О.Б. Измерять и править: как наука и государство производят экономические знания // Terra Economicus. 2021. Т. 19. № 3. С. 6–19.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Koshovets O.B. Izmeryat' i pravit': kak nauka i gosudarstvo proizvodyat ekonomicheskie znaniya. Terra Economicus. 2021. T. 19. № 3. S. 6–19. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ореховский П.А. Авторитетный дискурс российского экономиста // Общественные науки и современность. 2015. №. 6. С. 97–115.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Orekhovskiy P.A. Avtoritetnyy diskurs rossiyskogo ekonomista. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2015. №. 6. S. 97–115. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ореховский П.А. История экономической мысли глазами структуралиста. Ч. 1. Классики и Маркс // Вопросы теоретической экономики. 2023. № 4. С. 137–154. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2023_4_137_154.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Orekhovskiy P.A. Istoriya ekonomicheskoy mysli glazami strukturalista. Ch. 1. Klassiki i Marks. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki. 2023. № 4. S. 137–154. https://doi.org/10.52342/25877666VTE_2023_4_137_154. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Соколова Г.Н. Экономическая социология: истоки, методология, созидательный потенциал // Гуманитарные, социально-экономические и общественные науки. 2015. Т. 2. № 11. С. 109–118.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sokolova G.N. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya: istoki, metodologiya, sozidatel'nyy potentsial. Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. 2015. T. 2. № 11. S. 109–118. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тамбовцев В.Л. Идеи, нарративы и изменения в экономике // Terra Economicus. 2019. Т. 17. № 1. С. 24–40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tambovtsev V.L. Idei, narrativy i izmeneniya v ekonomike. Terra Economicus. 2019. T. 17. № 1. S. 24–40. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тамбовцев В.Л. Народная экономическая теория и феномен отступления демократии // Вопросы теоретической экономики. 2024. № 4. С. 45–58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tambovtsev V.L. Narodnaya ekonomicheskaya teoriya i fenomen otstupleniya demokratii. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki. 2024. № 4. S. 45–58. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тутов Л.А. Подходы к формированию современного экономического знания // Научные исследования экономического факультета. Электронный журнал. 2015. Т. 7. № 3. С. 7–17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tutov L.A. Podkhody k formirovaniyu sovremennogo ekonomicheskogo znaniya. Nauchnye issledovaniya ekonomicheskogo fakul'teta. Elektronnyy zhurnal. 2015. T. 7. № 3. S. 7–17. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тутов Л.А., Шаститко А.Е. Метаязык внутридисциплинарного дискурса для научно-исследовательских программ: приглашение к разговору // Вопросы экономики. 2021. Т. 4. С. 96– 115.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tutov L.A., Shastitko A.E. Metayazyk vnutridistsiplinarnogo diskursa dlya nauchno-issledovatel'skikh programm: priglashenie k razgovoru. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2021. T. 4. S. 96–115.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Филимонов И.В. Роль государства в трансформации экосистемы цифровой экономики. Дисс. … канд. эк. наук. М., 2024.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Filimonov I.V. Rol' gosudarstva v transformatsii ekosistemy tsifrovoy ekonomiki. Diss. … kand. ek. nauk. M., 2024. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фуркад М., Ольон Э., Альган Я. Превосходство экономистов // Вопросы экономики. 2015. № 7. С. 45–72.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Furkad M., Ol'on E., Al'gan Ya. Prevoskhodstvo ekonomistov. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2015. № 7. S. 45–72. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ченцова М.В. Новая парадигма экономического развития: институты, инновации и «экономика знаний» // Молодой ученый. 2014. № 11 (70). С. 249–252.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chentsova M.V. Novaya paradigma ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: instituty, innovatsii i «ekonomika znaniy». Molodoy uchenyy. 2014. № 11 (70). S. 249–252. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шохин А.Н. и др. Бизнес и власть в России: теория и практика взаимодействия. М.: ВШЭ, 2011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shokhin A.N. i dr. Biznes i vlast' v Rossii: teoriya i praktika vzaimodeystviya. M.: VShE, 2011. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ambrosino A., Cedrini M., Davis J.B. et al. What topic modeling could reveal about the evolution of economics // Journal of Economic Methodology. 2018. Vol. 25 (2). P. 1–20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ambrosino A., Cedrini M., Davis J.B. et al. What topic modeling could reveal about the evolution of economics. Journal of Economic Methodology. 2018. Vol. 25 (2). P. 1–20.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Angrist J., Azoulay P., Ellison G., Hill R., Lu S.F. Economic Research Evolves: Fields and Styles // American Economic Review. 2017. Vol. 107 (5). P. 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171117.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Angrist J., Azoulay P., Ellison G., Hill R., Lu S.F. Economic Research Evolves: Fields and Styles. American Economic Review. 2017. Vol. 107 (5). P. 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171117.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blaug M. The methodology of economics: Or, how economists explain. Cambridge University Press, 1992.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blaug M. The methodology of economics: Or, how economists explain. Cambridge University Press, 1992.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caldwell B. Of positivism and the history of economic thought // Southern economic journal. 2013. Vol. 79. No. 4. P. 753–767.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caldwell B. Of positivism and the history of economic thought. Southern economic journal. 2013. Vol. 79. No. 4. P. 753–767.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colander D. Moving beyond the rhetoric of pluralism // Economic pluralism. 2009. Vol. 122. P. 36.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colander D. Moving beyond the rhetoric of pluralism. Economic pluralism. 2009. Vol. 122. P. 36.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Consoli S., Pezzoli L. T., Tosetti E. Emotions in macroeconomic news and their impact on the european bond market // Journal of International Money and Finance. 2021. Vol. 118. P. 102472.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Consoli S., Pezzoli L. T., Tosetti E. Emotions in macroeconomic news and their impact on the european bond market. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2021. Vol. 118. P. 102472.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cross R. The Duhem-Quine thesis, Lakatos and the appraisal of theories in macroeconomics // The economic journal. 1982. Vol. 92. No. 366. P. 320–340.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cross R. The Duhem-Quine thesis, Lakatos and the appraisal of theories in macroeconomics. The economic journal. 1982. Vol. 92. No. 366. P. 320–340.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Edwards J., Giraud Y., Schinckus C. A quantitative turn in the historiography of economics? // Journal of Economic Methodology. 2018. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 283–290.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Edwards J., Giraud Y., Schinckus C. A quantitative turn in the historiography of economics? Journal of Economic Methodology. 2018. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 283–290.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Feyerabend P. Experts in a free society // Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift. 1977. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 389–405.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Feyerabend P. Experts in a free society. Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift. 1977. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 389–405.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fulton G. Research programmes in economics // History of Political Economy. 1984. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 187–205.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fulton G. Research programmes in economics. History of Political Economy. 1984. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 187–205.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Graeber D., Meister L., Poutvaara P. Restrictions to civil liberties in a pandemic and satisfaction with democracy // European Journal of Political Economy. 2024. Vol. 85. P. 102593.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Graeber D., Meister L., Poutvaara P. Restrictions to civil liberties in a pandemic and satisfaction with democracy. European Journal of Political Economy. 2024. Vol. 85. P. 102593.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gupta A., Dutta H., Bedathur S., Dey, L. A machine learning approach to quantitative prosopography // arXiv preprint. 2018. No. 1801.10080.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gupta A., Dutta H., Bedathur S., Dey, L. A machine learning approach to quantitative prosopography. arXiv preprint. 2018. No. 1801.10080.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hamermesh D. Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How? // Journal of Economic Literature. 2012. Vol. 51 (1). P. 162.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hamermesh D. Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How? Journal of Economic Literature. 2012. Vol. 51 (1). P. 162.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hausman D.M. The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge University Press, 2023.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hausman D.M. The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge University Press, 2023.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hayek F.A. The intellectuals and socialism // The University of Chicago Law Review. 1949. Vol. 16 (3). P. 417–433.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hayek F.A. The intellectuals and socialism. The University of Chicago Law Review. 1949. Vol. 16 (3). P. 417–433.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Keynes J.M. General theory of employment, interest and money. Atlantic Publishers Dist, 2006.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keynes J.M. General theory of employment, interest and money. Atlantic Publishers Dist, 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim E.H., Morse A., Zingales L. What has mattered to economics since 1970 // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2006. Vol. 20 (4). P. 189–202.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim E.H., Morse A., Zingales L. What has mattered to economics since 1970. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2006. Vol. 20 (4). P. 189–202.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Klamer A. The textbook presentation of economic discourse // Economics as discourse: An analysis of the language of economists. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1990. P. 129–165.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Klamer A. The textbook presentation of economic discourse. Economics as discourse: An analysis of the language of economists. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1990. P. 129–165.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kuhn T.S. The structure of scientific revolutions. 1962.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuhn T.S. The structure of scientific revolutions. 1962.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maesse J. et al. Power and influence of economists: Contributions to the social studies of economics. Taylor and Francis, 2022. P. 286.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maesse J. et al. Power and influence of economists: Contributions to the social studies of economics. Taylor and Francis, 2022. P. 286.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Marshall A. Some aspects of competition // Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1890. Vol. 53. No. 4. P. 612–643.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marshall A. Some aspects of competition. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1890. Vol. 53. No. 4. P. 612–643.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McCloskey D.N. The rhetoric of economics // Journal of economic literature. 1983. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 481–517.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McCloskey D.N. The rhetoric of economics. Journal of economic literature. 1983. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 481–517.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mukand S., Rodrik D. The political economy of ideas: On ideas versus interests in policymaking // National Bureau of Economic Research. 2018. No. w24467.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mukand S., Rodrik D. The political economy of ideas: On ideas versus interests in policymaking. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2018. No. w24467.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ormerod P., Nyman R., Tuckett D. Measuring financial sentiment to predict financial instability: A new approach based on text analysis // arXiv preprint. 2015. No. 1508.05357.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ormerod P., Nyman R., Tuckett D. Measuring financial sentiment to predict financial instability: A new approach based on text analysis. arXiv preprint. 2015. No. 1508.05357.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rommel F., Kasperan R.L. Pluralism is not'anything goes'-grounding pluralism in economics in diverse economies by rehabilitating Paul Feyerabend // International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education. 2022. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 43–71.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rommel F., Kasperan R.L. Pluralism is not'anything goes'-grounding pluralism in economics in diverse economies by rehabilitating Paul Feyerabend. International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education. 2022. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 43–71.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nyman R., Ormerod P. Text as Data: Real-time Measurement of Economic Welfare // arXiv preprint. 2020. No. 2001.03401.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nyman R., Ormerod P. Text as Data: Real-time Measurement of Economic Welfare. arXiv preprint. 2020. No. 2001.03401.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit50"><label>50</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Puehringer S., Beyer K. Who are the economists Germany listens to? Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy, 2020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Puehringer S., Beyer K. Who are the economists Germany listens to? Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy, 2020.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit51"><label>51</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ricardo D. The first six chapters of the principles of political economy and taxation. Macmillan and Company, 1895.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ricardo D. The first six chapters of the principles of political economy and taxation. Macmillan and Company, 1895.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit52"><label>52</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhitomirsky-Geffet M., Prebor G. Toward a cross-generational social network for the Jewish sages’ prosopography // Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. 2019. Vol. 34. No. 3. P. 676–695.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhitomirsky-Geffet M., Prebor G. Toward a cross-generational social network for the Jewish sages’ prosopography. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. 2019. Vol. 34. No. 3. P. 676–695.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit53"><label>53</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Svorenčík A. MIT's Rise to Prominence: Outline of a Collective Biography // CHOPE Working Paper. 2013. No. 2013-19.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Svorenčík A. MIT's Rise to Prominence: Outline of a Collective Biography. CHOPE Working Paper. 2013. No. 2013-19.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit54"><label>54</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smith A. 1776 An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations // Foundations of Monetary Economics. 2024. Vol. 1. P. 223–295.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smith A. 1776 An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Foundations of Monetary Economics. 2024. Vol. 1. P. 223–295.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit55"><label>55</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tilly S., Ebner M., Livan G. Macroeconomic forecasting through news, emotions and narrative // Expert Systems with Applications. 2021. Vol. 175. P. 114760.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tilly S., Ebner M., Livan G. Macroeconomic forecasting through news, emotions and narrative. Expert Systems with Applications. 2021. Vol. 175. P. 114760.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit56"><label>56</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Google Scholar: URL: https://scholar.google.com (дата обращения: 20.08.2025).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Google Scholar: Available at: https://scholar.google.com (accessed: 20.08.2025).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
