sciresНаучные исследования экономического факультета. Электронный журналScientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal2078-3809Moscow State University10.38050/2078-3809-2026-18-2-77-91scires-468Research ArticleПространственная экономикаПространственные факторы результативности экономических организацийSpatial Factors of Economic Organizations PerformanceСпекторС. В.SpektorS. V.

Спектор Станислав Викторович - аспирант

 

Stanislav V. Spektor - Postgraduate student

spektorstas@gmail.comМГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова, экономический факультетРоссияLomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of EconomicsRussian Federation2026180920261827791Copyright © Спектор С.В., 20262026Спектор С.В.Spektor S.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://scires.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/468

Пространственные факторы становятся предметом изучения в экономической литературе уже почти два века. Однако единое понимание связи пространственных механизмов и экономических результатов фирм отсутствует. Цель работы – систематизация теории влияния пространственных факторов на результаты экономических организаций. В исследовании рассмотрены классические и современные подходы, выделены три группы пространственных факторов – природные, общетерриториальные и микроуровневые. На основе анализа литературы предложены схема их взаимодействия и классификация факторов результативности экономических организаций. Результаты позволяют обобщить существующие модели и уточнить роль пространственных характеристик в формировании экономической эффективности фирм.

Spatial factors have been a subject of economic research for almost two centuries. However, there is still no unified understanding of the relationship between spatial mechanisms and firms' economic performance. The purpose of this paper is to systematize the theory of the influence of spatial factors on the performance of economic organizations. The study reviews both classical and modern approaches and identifies three groups of spatial factors – natural, territorial, and micro-level. Based on a literature analysis, a framework of their interaction and a classification of performance indicators of economic organizations are proposed. The results help to generalize existing models and clarify the role of spatial characteristics in shaping firms' economic efficiency.

пространственные факторыэкономические организацииагломерациягородская экономикапространственное равновесиерезультативность фирмspatial factorseconomic organizationsagglomerationurban economicsspatial equilibriumfirm performanceReferencesAhlfeldt G.M. et al. The Economics of Density: Evidence from the Berlin Wall // Econometrica. 2015. Vol. 83 (6). P. 2127–2189. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10876.Ahlfeldt G.M. et al. The Economics of Density: Evidence from the Berlin Wall. Econometrica. 2015. Vol. 83 (6). P. 2127–2189. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10876.Aigner D., Lovell C.A.K., Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models // Journal of Econometrics. 1977. Vol. 6 (1). P. 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5.Aigner D., Lovell C.A.K., Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics. 1977. Vol. 6 (1). P. 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5.Angel S. et al. The shape compactness of urban footprints // Progress in Planning. 2020. Vol. 139 (November). P. 100429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2018.12.001.Angel S. et al. The shape compactness of urban footprints. Progress in Planning. 2020. Vol. 139 (November). P. 100429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2018.12.001.Bresnahan T.F., Reiss P.C. Entry and Competition in Concentrated Markets // Journal of Political Economy. 1991. Vol. 99 (5). P. 977–1009.Bresnahan T.F., Reiss P.C. Entry and Competition in Concentrated Markets. Journal of Political Economy. 1991. Vol. 99 (5). P. 977–1009.Carlino G.A., Chatterjee S., Hunt R.M. Urban density and the rate of invention // Journal of Urban Economics. 2007. Vol. 61 (3). P. 389–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.08.003.Carlino G.A., Chatterjee S., Hunt R.M. Urban density and the rate of invention. Journal of Urban Economics. 2007. Vol. 61 (3). P. 389–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.08.003.Churchman A. Disentangling the Concept of Density // Journal of Planning Literature. 1999. Vol. 13 (4). P. 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854129922092478.Churchman A. Disentangling the Concept of Density. Journal of Planning Literature. 1999. Vol. 13 (4). P. 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854129922092478.Ciccone A., Hall R.E. Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity // American Economic Review. 1996. P. 54–70. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4313.Ciccone A., Hall R.E. Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity. American Economic Review. 1996. P. 54–70. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4313.Clark C. Von Thünen’s Isolated State // Oxford Economic Papers. 1967. Vol. 19 (3). P. 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041056.Clark C. Von Thünen’s Isolated State. Oxford Economic Papers. 1967. Vol. 19 (3). P. 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041056.Combes P.-P. et al. The Productivity Advantages of Large Cities: Distinguishing Agglomeration from Firm Selection // Econometrica. 2012. Vol. 80 (6). P. 2543–2594. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta8442.Combes P.-P. et al. The Productivity Advantages of Large Cities: Distinguishing Agglomeration from Firm Selection. Econometrica. 2012. Vol. 80 (6). P. 2543–2594. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta8442.d’Aspremont C., Gabszewicz J.J., Thisse J.-F. On Hotelling’s «Stability in Competition» // Econometrica. 1979. Vol. 47 (5). P. 1145. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911955.d’Aspremont C., Gabszewicz J.J., Thisse J.-F. On Hotelling’s «Stability in Competition». Econometrica. 1979. Vol. 47 (5). P. 1145. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911955.DellaVigna S., Gentzkow M. Uniform Pricing in U.S. Retail Chains // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2019. Vol. 134 (4). P. 2011–2084. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz019.DellaVigna S., Gentzkow M. Uniform Pricing in U.S. Retail Chains. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2019. Vol. 134 (4). P. 2011–2084. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz019.Duranton G., Overman H.G. Testing for Localization Using Micro-Geographic Data // The Review of Economic Studies. 2005. Vol. 72 (4). P. 1077–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00362.Duranton G., Overman H.G. Testing for Localization Using Micro-Geographic Data. The Review of Economic Studies. 2005. Vol. 72 (4). P. 1077–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00362.Duranton G., Puga D. Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life Cycle of Products // American Economic Review. 2001. Vol. 91 (5). P. 1454–1477.Duranton G., Puga D. Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life Cycle of Products. American Economic Review. 2001. Vol. 91 (5). P. 1454–1477.Duranton G., Puga D. Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies // Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Ch. 48. Elsevier Inc., 2004. P. 2063–2117.Duranton G., Puga D. Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Ch. 48. Elsevier Inc., 2004. P. 2063–2117.Duranton G., Puga D. The Economics of Urban Density // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2020. Vol. 34 (3). P. 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.3.3.Duranton G., Puga D. The Economics of Urban Density. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2020. Vol. 34 (3). P. 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.3.3.Ellison G., Glaeser E.L. Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach // Journal of Political Economy. 1997. Vol. 105 (5). P. 889–927. https://doi.org/10.1086/262098.Ellison G., Glaeser E.L. Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach. Journal of Political Economy. 1997. Vol. 105 (5). P. 889–927. https://doi.org/10.1086/262098.Ellison G., Glaeser E.L., Kerr W.R. What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns // American Economic Review. 2010. Vol. 100 (3). P. 1195–1213. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.1195.Ellison G., Glaeser E.L., Kerr W.R. What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns. American Economic Review. 2010. Vol. 100 (3). P. 1195–1213. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.1195.Glass A.J., Kenjegalieva K., Sickles R.C. A Spatial Autoregressive Stochastic Frontier Model for Panel Data with Asymmetric Efficiency Spillovers // Journal of Econometrics. 2016. Vol. 190 (2). P. 289–300.Glass A.J., Kenjegalieva K., Sickles R.C. A Spatial Autoregressive Stochastic Frontier Model for Panel Data with Asymmetric Efficiency Spillovers. Journal of Econometrics. 2016. Vol. 190 (2). P. 289–300.Greenstone M., Hornbeck R., Moretti E. Identifying Agglomeration Spillovers: Evidence from Winners and Losers of Large Plant Openings // Journal of Political Economy. 2010. Vol. 118 (3). P. 536–598. https://doi.org/10.1086/653714.Greenstone M., Hornbeck R., Moretti E. Identifying Agglomeration Spillovers: Evidence from Winners and Losers of Large Plant Openings. Journal of Political Economy. 2010. Vol. 118 (3). P. 536–598. https://doi.org/10.1086/653714.Handbury J., Weinstein D.E. Goods Prices and Availability in Cities // The Review of Economic Studies. 2015. Vol. 82 (1). P. 258–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdu033.Handbury J., Weinstein D.E. Goods Prices and Availability in Cities. The Review of Economic Studies. 2015. Vol. 82 (1). P. 258–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdu033.Harari M. Cities in Bad Shape: Urban Geometry in India // American Economic Review. 2020. Vol. 110 (8). P. 2377–2421. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171673.Harari M. Cities in Bad Shape: Urban Geometry in India. American Economic Review. 2020. Vol. 110 (8). P. 2377–2421. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171673.Harris C.D., Ullman E.L. The Nature of Cities // The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1945. Vol. 242 (1). P. 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624524200103.Harris C.D., Ullman E.L. The Nature of Cities. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1945. Vol. 242 (1). P. 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624524200103.Henderson J.V. Marshall’ s scale economies // Journal of urban economics. 2003. Vol. 53. P. 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/653714.Henderson J.V. Marshall’ s scale economies // Journal of urban economics. 2003. Vol. 53. P. 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/653714.Holmes T.J. The Diffusion of Wal-Mart and Economies of Density // Econometrica. 2011. Vol. 79 (1). P. 253–302. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7699.Holmes T.J. The Diffusion of Wal-Mart and Economies of Density. Econometrica. 2011. Vol. 79 (1). P. 253–302. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7699.Hotelling H. Stability in Competition // The Economic Journal. 1929. Vol. 39 (153). P. 41–57.Hotelling H. Stability in Competition. The Economic Journal. 1929. Vol. 39 (153). P. 41–57.Hoyt H. The structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American. US Government Printing Office, 1939.Hoyt H. The structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American. US Government Printing Office, 1939.Krugman P. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography // Journal of Political Economy. 1991. Vol. 99 (3). P. 483–499.Krugman P. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy. 1991. Vol. 99 (3). P. 483–499.Krugman P.R. Geography and Trade. MIT Press, 1992. 156 p.Krugman P.R. Geography and Trade. MIT Press, 1992. 156 p.Marshall A. Principles of economics, 8th Ed., 1920. 627 p.Marshall A. Principles of economics, 8th Ed., 1920. 627 p.Meekes J. Agglomeration Economies and the Urban Wage Premium in Australia // SSRN Electronic Journal. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3938580.Meekes J. Agglomeration Economies and the Urban Wage Premium in Australia. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3938580.Mossay P., Shin J.K., Smrkolj G. Quality Differentiation and Spatial Clustering among Restaurants // International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2022. Vol. 80. P. 102799.Mossay P., Shin J.K., Smrkolj G. Quality Differentiation and Spatial Clustering among Restaurants. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2022. Vol. 80. P. 102799.Neuman M. The Compact City Fallacy // Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2005. Vol. 25 (1). P. 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04270466.Neuman M. The Compact City Fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2005. Vol. 25 (1). P. 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04270466.Orhun A.Y. Spatial differentiation in the supermarket industry: The role of common information // Quantitative Marketing and Economics. 2013. Vol. 11 (1). P. 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-012-9123-x.Orhun A.Y. Spatial differentiation in the supermarket industry: The role of common information. Quantitative Marketing and Economics. 2013. Vol. 11 (1). P. 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-012-9123-x.Park R.E., Burgess E.W. The City. University of Chicago Press, 1925.Park R.E., Burgess E.W. The City. University of Chicago Press, 1925.Quintero L.E., Roberts M. Cities and productivity: Evidence from 16 Latin American and Caribbean countries // Journal of Urban Economics. 2023. Vol. 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2023.103573.Quintero L.E., Roberts M. Cities and productivity: Evidence from 16 Latin American and Caribbean countries. Journal of Urban Economics. 2023. Vol. 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2023.103573.Ramajo J., Hewings G.J.D. Modeling Regional Productive Performance Using a Spatial Stochastic Frontier Approach: New Evidence for Europe (1995–2007) // Regional Studies. 2007. Vol. 52 (10). P. 31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1390219.Ramajo J., Hewings G.J.D. Modeling Regional Productive Performance Using a Spatial Stochastic Frontier Approach: New Evidence for Europe (1995–2007). Regional Studies. 2018. Vol. 52 (10). P. 31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1390219.Roback J. Wages, Rents, and the Quality of Life // Journal of Political Economy. 1982. Vol. 90 (6). P. 1257–1278. https://doi.org/10.1086/261120.Roback J. Wages, Rents, and the Quality of Life. Journal of Political Economy. 1982. Vol. 90 (6). P. 1257–1278. https://doi.org/10.1086/261120.Rosen S. Wage-based indexes of urban quality of life // Current issues in urban economics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979. P. 74–104.Rosen S. Wage-based indexes of urban quality of life. Current issues in urban economics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979. P. 74–104.Rosenthal S.S., Strange W.C. Geography, Industrial Organization, and Agglomeration // Review of Economics and Statistics. 2003. Vol. 85 (2). P. 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303765299882.Rosenthal S.S., Strange W.C. Geography, Industrial Organization, and Agglomeration. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2003. Vol. 85 (2). P. 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303765299882.Salop S.C. Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods // The Bell Journal of Economics. 1979. Vol. 10 (1). P. 141. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003323.Salop S.C. Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods. The Bell Journal of Economics. 1979. Vol. 10 (1). P. 141. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003323.Schiff N. Cities and product variety: evidence from restaurants // Journal of Economic Geography. 2015. Vol. 15. P. 1085–1123. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu040.Schiff N. Cities and product variety: evidence from restaurants. Journal of Economic Geography. 2015. Vol. 15. P. 1085–1123. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu040.Tsukamoto T. A spatial autoregressive stochastic frontier model for panel data incorporating a model of technical inefficiency // Japan and The World Economy. 2019. Vol. 50. P. 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2018.11.003.Tsukamoto T. A spatial autoregressive stochastic frontier model for panel data incorporating a model of technical inefficiency. Japan and The World Economy. 2019. Vol. 50. P. 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2018.11.003.Weber A. Alfred Weber’s theory of the location of industries. 1929.Weber A. Alfred Weber’s theory of the location of industries. 1929.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.