<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">scires</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Научные исследования экономического факультета. Электронный журнал</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2078-3809</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Moscow State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.38050/2078-3809-2017-9-2-7-14</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">scires-59</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ВОПРОСЫ ТЕОРИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THEORETICAL ISSUES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ЭКОНОМИКА СЛУЧАЙНОСТИ: ПОВЕДЕНЧЕСКИЕ АСПЕКТЫ ПРИНЯТИЯ РЕШЕНИЙ В УСЛОВИЯХ РИСКА</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>ECONOMICS OF RANDOMNESS: BEHAVIORAL ASPECTS OF DECISION MAKING UNDER RISK</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Красильников</surname><given-names>Александр Сергеевич</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Krasilnikov</surname><given-names>Alexander</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">askrasil@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Финансовый университет при Правительстве РФ</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>askrasil@gmail.com</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>7</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Красильников А.С., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Красильников А.С.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Krasilnikov A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://scires.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/59">https://scires.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/59</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье обсуждается эволюция понятия риска в экономической науке. Рассматривается история развития вероятностных методов и подходов к анализу риска и неопределенности. Анализируется теория ожидаемой полезности, поведенческие аспекты, эвристические модели и методы нейроэкономики. Автор исследует устойчивость неоклассической программы в части риск-анализа и предлагает дальнейшие направления развития.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper discusses evolution of the concept of risk in economics. History of probabilistic methods and approaches to risk and uncertainty analysis is considered. Expected utility theory, behavioral approaches, heuristic models and methods of neuroeconomics are analyzed. Author investigates stability of neoclassical program related to risk analysis and suggests further directions of development.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>нейроэкономика</kwd><kwd>бихевиоризм</kwd><kwd>психология и экономика</kwd><kwd>рациональность</kwd><kwd>неоклассика</kwd><kwd>эвристические модели</kwd><kwd>жесткое ядро</kwd><kwd>neuroeconomics</kwd><kwd>behaviorism</kwd><kwd>psychology and economics</kwd><kwd>rationality</kwd><kwd>neoclassical economics</kwd><kwd>heuristic models</kwd><kwd>hard core</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. - М.: Эксмо, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. - М.: Эксмо, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DellaVigna S. Psychology and Economics: evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47:2, 2009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DellaVigna S. Psychology and Economics: evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47:2, 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brandstätter E., Gigerenzer G., Hertwig R. The Priority Heuristic: Making Choices Without Trade-Offs. Psychological review. 2006; 113(2): 409-432. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.409.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brandstätter E., Gigerenzer G., Hertwig R. The Priority Heuristic: Making Choices Without Trade-Offs. Psychological review. 2006; 113(2): 409-432. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.409.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979; 47:263-291.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979; 47:263-291.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Keynes J.M. A treatise on probability. In: MOGGRIDGE, D. (Ed.) The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes. London: MacMillan Press, v.8, 1973.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keynes J.M. A treatise on probability. In: MOGGRIDGE, D. (Ed.) The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes. London: MacMillan Press, v.8, 1973.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Keynes J. M. 1937. The General Theory of Employment: Quarterly Journal of Economics 51: 213-214.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keynes J. M. 1937. The General Theory of Employment: Quarterly Journal of Economics 51: 213-214.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Marco Crocco. The concept of degrees of uncertainty in Keynes, Shackle, and Davidson. Nova Economia, 2002, vol 12, № 2, p. 13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marco Crocco. The concept of degrees of uncertainty in Keynes, Shackle, and Davidson. Nova Economia, 2002, vol 12, № 2, p. 13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Neuroeconomics (Second Edition). Decision Making and the Brain. Edited by: Paul W. Glimcher and Ernst Fehr 2014. P. 159-160.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Neuroeconomics (Second Edition). Decision Making and the Brain. Edited by: Paul W. Glimcher and Ernst Fehr 2014. P. 159-160.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1992; 5:297-323.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1992; 5:297-323.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ: 1947.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ: 1947.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
