Влияние социального капитала на проэкологичность поведения индивидов
https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2021-13-1-52-81
Аннотация
В нашем исследовании рассматривается взаимосвязь социального капитала и проэкологичного поведения индивидов. Для оценки влияния используются данные по США из WVS за 2011 год и строятся модели, оцененные с помощью МНК. Мы предполагаем, что обобщенное доверие, доверие к соседям и глобальная идентичность индивида оказывают значимое положительное влияние на участие в экологических демонстрациях, пожертвования в экологические организации и на общую оценку проэкологичности поведения индивидов. Наши результаты подтвердили положительное влияние доверия к соседям на общую оценку проэкологичности поведения, причем зависимость сильнее для тех, кто также доверяет людям в целом. Самоидентификация себя как «гражданина мира» оказала влияние на все рассматриваемые переменные проэкологичного поведения. Это свидетельствует о сильной связи социального капитала и обеспокоенности защитой окружающей среды.
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
О. В. Кудрявцева
МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова, Экономический факультет
(г. Москва)
Россия
Россия
Кудрявцева Ольга Владимировна - доктор экономических наук, профессор,
П. А. Куликов
МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова, Экономический факультет
(г. Москва)
Россия
Россия
Куликов Пётр Алексеевич - студент бакалавриата, 4 курс
А. О. Куликова
МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова, Экономический факультет
(г. Москва)
Россия
Россия
Куликова Анна Олеговна - студент бакалавриата, 4 курс
В. В. Фокина
МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова, Экономический факультет
(г. Москва)
Россия
Россия
Фокина Виктория Вячеславовна - студент бакалавриата, 4 курс
Список литературы
1. Искендерова С. М. Экологическое образование как первичная стадия решения эколо-гических проблем // XXI век: итоги прошлого и проблемы настоящего плюс. 2015. Т. 1. №. 6. С. 89.
2. Привалова Е. А. Проэкологичное поведение: гендерные установки // Прикладная пси-хология на службе развивающейся личности. 2017. С. 195–200.
3. Allcott H. Social norms and energy conservation // Journal of Public Economics. Elsevier.2011. V. 95(9). P. 1082–1095.
4. Arp III W., Kenny Ch. Black environmentalism in the local community context // Environment and Behavior. 1996. V. 28.3. P. 267–282.
5. Bjerke T., Kaltenborn B. P. The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes toward large carnivores // Journal of Environmental psychology. 1999. V. 3 19.4. P. 415–421.
6. Boca G. D., Saraçlı S. Environmental education and student’s perception, for sustainability // Sustainability. 2019. Т. 11. V. 6. P. 1553.
7. Bonnes M. et al. Inhabitants' and experts' assessments of environmental quality for urban sustainability // Journal of Social Issues. 2007. Т. 63. V. 1. P. 59–78.
8. Brécard D. et al. Determinants of demand for green products: An application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe // Ecological economics. 2009. Т. 69. V. 1. P. 115–125.
9. Caferra R., Colasante A., Morone A. The less you burn, the more we earn: The role of social and political trust on energy-saving behaviour in Europe // Energy Research and Social Science, January 2021. V. 71, 02.
10. Cameron T. A., Englin J. Respondent experience and contingent valuation of environmental goods // Journal of Environmental Economics and management. 1997. Т. 33. V. 3. P. 296–313.
11. Carlsson B., Fridh A. C. Technology transfer in US universities: a survey and statistical analysis // Department of Economics, Weatherhead School of Management. 2000.
12. Chen Xiaodong et al. Effects of attitudinal and sociodemographic factors on pro-environmental behaviour in urban China // Environmental Conservation. 2011. P. 45–52.
13. Chuvieco E. et al. Factors affecting environmental sustainability habits of university students: Intercomparison analysis in three countries (Spain, Brazil and UAE) // Journal of cleaner production. 2018. Т. 198. P. 1372–1380.
14. Clayton S., Kilinç A. Proenvironmental concern and behavior in Turkey: The role of national and environmental identity // Psyecology, 2013. V. 4:3, P. 311–330
15. Corral-Verdugo V., Armendariz L. I. The “new environmental paradigm” in a Mexican community // The Journal of Environmental Education. 2000. V. 31.3. P. 25–31.
16. Côte R. R., Erickson Bonnie H. Untangling the Roots of Tolerance: How Forms of Social Capital Shape Attitudes toward Ethnic Minorities and Immigrants // American Behavioral Scientist. 2009. V. 52(12). P. 1664–1689.
17. Cvetkovich G., Winter P. L. Trust and social representations of the management of threatened and endangered species // Environment and Behavior. 2003. V. 35. P. 286–307.
18. Der-Karabetian A. et al. Sustainable Behavior, Perceived Globalization Impact, World-Mindedness, Identity, and Perceived Risk in College Samples from the United States, China, and Taiwan // Ecopsychology. 2014. V. 6. P. 218–233.
19. di Nenna P. M., Paolillo V., Giuliani M. M. Le convinzioni ambientaliste dei cacciatori italiani: Indagine conoscitiva per mezzo dell’ “ICA test” [Environmental values of Italian hunters: A cognitive study based on the ICA test] // Movimento. 1987. Т. 3. P. 104–110.
20. Dupont D. P. Do children matter? An examination of gender differences in environmental valuation // Ecological Economics. 2004. Т. 49. V. 3. P. 273–286.
21. Dwivedi O. P. Satyagraha for conservation: A Hindu view // Environmental ethics: Readings in theory and application. 2005. P. 286–294.
22. Dwivedi O. P., Tiwari, B. Environmental crisis and Hindu religion. New Delhi, India: Gitanjali, 1987.
23. Eagles P. F. J., Demare R. Factors influencing children's environmental attitudes // The Journal of Environmental Education. 1999. Т. 30. V. 4. P. 33–37.
24. Eckberg D. L., Blocker T. J. Christianity, environmentalism, and the theoretical problem of fundamentalism // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1996. P. 343–355.
25. Feinberg M., Willer R. The moral roots of environmental attitudes // Psychological science. 2013. V. 24.1. P. 56–62.
26. Franzen A. Environmental attitudes in international comparison: An analysis of the ISSP surveys 1993 and 2000 // Social science quarterly. 2003. Т. 84. V. 2. P. 297–308.
27. Gardner G. T., Stern P. C. Environmental problems and human behavior. Allyn, Bacon, 1996.
28. Gifford R., Nilsson A. Personal and social factors that influence pro‐environmental concern and behaviour: A review // International Journal of Psychology. 2014. V. 49.3. P. 141–157.
29. Gifford R. The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation // American psychologist. 2011. V. 66.4. P. 290.
30. Grafton R. Q., Knowles S. Social capital and national environmental performance: A crosssectional analysis // The Journal of Environment & Development, 2004. V. 13(4). P. 336–370.
31. Hansmann R., Laurenti R., Mehdi T., Binder C. R. Determinants of pro-environmental behavior: A comparison of university students and staff from diverse faculties at a Swiss University // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. 121864. P. 1–13.
32. Hayes B. G., Marangudakis M. Religion and attitudes towards nature in Britain //The British journal of sociology. 2001. Т. 52. V. 1. P. 139–155.
33. Hinds J., Sparks P. Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity // Journal of environmental psychology. 2008. V. 28.2. P. 109–120.
34. Hine D. W., Gifford R. Fear appeals, individual differences, and environmental concern // The Journal of Environmental Education. 1991. V. 23.1. P. 36–41.
35. Inglehart R. Modernization and post‐modernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies // Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 1997.
36. Israel D., Levinson A. Willingness to pay for environmental quality: testable empirical implications of the growth and environment literature // The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. 2004. Т. 3. V. 1. P. 2.
37. Laidley T. M. The influence of social class and cultural variables on environmental behaviors: Municipal-level evidence from Massachusetts // Environment and Behavior. 2013. Т. 45. V. 2. P. 170–197.
38. Levine D. S., Strube M. J. Environmental attitudes, knowledge, intentions and behaviors among college students // The Journal of social psychology. 2012. Т. 152. V. 3. P. 308–326.
39. Luchs M. G., Mooradian T. A. Sex, personality, and sustainable consumer behaviour: Elucidating the gender effect // Journal of Consumer Policy. 2012. Т. 35. V. 1. P. 127–144.
40. Lutz, A. R., Simpson-Housley P., Deman A. F. Wilderness: Rural and urban attitudes and perceptions // Environment and Behavior. 1999. V. 31.2. P. 259–266.
41. Macias T., Williams K. Know Your Neighbors, Save the Planet: Social Capital and the Widening Wedge of Pro-Environmental Outcomes // Environment and Behavior. 2016. V. 48(3). P. 391–420.
42. Macias T., Nelson E. A Social Capital Basis for Environmental Concern: Evidence from Northern New England // Rural Sociology. 2011. V. 76(4). P. 562–81.
43. Manzo L. C., Weinstein N. D. Behavioral commitment to environmental protection: A study of active and nonactive members of the Sierra Club // Environment and Behavior, 1987. V. 19. P. 673–694.
44. Meyer A. Does education increase pro-environmental behavior? Evidence from Europe // Ecological economics. 2015. Т. 116. P. 108–121.
45. Miller E., Buys L. The impact of social capital on residential wateraffecting behaviors in a drought-prone Australian community. // Society & Natural Resources, 2008. V. 21. P. 244–257.
46. Millock K., Nauges C. Household behaviour and food consumption // Greening Household Behaviour. 2014. P. 183.
47. Myung J. Does Social Capital Promote Pro-Environmental Behaviors? Implications for Collaborative Governance // International Journal of Public Administration. 2013. V. 36:6. P. 397–407.
48. Ng S., Basu S. Global Identity and Preference for Environmentally Friendly Products: The Role of Personal Responsibility // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2019. V. 50. P. 919– 936.
49. O'Connor R. E. et al. Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? // Social Science Quarterly. 2002. V. 83.1. P. 1–17.
50. Palmer J. A. Development of concern for the environment and formative experiences of educators // The Journal of Environmental Education. 1993. Т. 24. V. 3. P. 26–30.
51. Pinto D. C. et al. Green consumer values: how do personal values influence environmentally responsible water consumption? // International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2001. V. 35.2. P. 122–131.
52. Pretty J., Ward H. Social capital and the environment // World Development. 2001. V. 29, P. 209–227.
53. Putnam R. D., Leonardi R., Nanetti R. Y. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy // Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 1993.
54. Rice Gillian. Pro-environmental behavior in Egypt: is there a role for Islamic environmental ethics? // Journal of business ethics. 2006. V. 65.4. P. 373–390.
55. Robelia B., Murphy T. What do people know about key environmental issues? A review of environmental knowledge surveys // Environmental Education Research. 2012. Т. 18. V. 3. P. 299–321.
56. Schultz, P. W., Unipan J. B., Gamba R. J. Acculturation and ecological worldview among Latino Americans // The Journal of Environmental Education. 2000. No 31.2 P. 22–27.
57. Smith E. K., Mayer A. A Social Trap for the Climate? Collective Action, Trust and Climate Change Risk Perception in 35 Countries // Global Environmental Change. 2018. V. 49. P. 140–53.
58. Sønderskov K. Environmental group membership, collective action and generalised trust. // Environmental Politics. 2008. V. 17, P. 78–94.
59. Sønderskov K. Different Goods, Different Effects: Exploring the Effects of generalized Social Trust in Large-N Collective Action // Public Choice. 2009. V. 140(1–2). P. 145–60.
60. Steg L., Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda // Journal of environmental psychology. 2009. Т. 29. V. 3. P. 309–317.
61. Thøgersen John. A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2000. V. 24.1. P. 93–103.
62. Tianyu J., Meng L. Does education increase pro-environmental willingness to pay? Evidence from Chinese household survey //Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. Т. 275. 122713. P. 1–9.
63. Uyeki E. S., Holland L. J. Diffusion of pro-environment attitudes? // American Behavioral Scientist. 2000. V. 43.4. P. 646–662.
64. Uzzell D. L. The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems // Journal of environmental psychology. 2000. Т. 20. V. 4. P. 307–318.
65. Veisten K., Hoen H. F., Navrud S., Strand J. Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities // Journal of environmental management. 2004. Т. 73. V. 4. P. 317–331.
66. Videras J., Owen A. L., Conover E., Wu S. The influence of social relationships on pro-environment behaviors // Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2012. V. 63, 35–50.
67. Vlek C., Steg L. Human Behavior and Environmental Sustainability: Problems, Driving Forces, and Research Topics // Journal of social issues. 2007. Т. 63. V. 1. P. 1–19.
68. Whitmarsh L. Behavioural responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts // Journal of environmental psychology. 2009. V. 29.1. P. 13–23.
69. Whitney E. Lynn White, ecotheology, and history // Environmental Ethics. 1993. Т. 15. V. 2. P. 151–169.
70. Xiao C., Hong D. Gender differences in environmental behaviors in China // Population and Environment. 2010. Т. 32. V. 1. P. 88–104.
71. Zelezny L. C., Yelverton J. A. Feminine identity, collectivism, and environmental attitudes and behaviors // Meeting of the Western Psychological Association. Portland, OR. 2000.
72. База данных WVS [Электронный ресурс] / Inglehart, R., C. Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin, B. Puranen et al. (eds.). 2014. World Values Survey: Round Six – Country-Pooled Datafile Version: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Кудрявцева О.В., Куликов П.А., Куликова А.О., Фокина В.В. Влияние социального капитала на проэкологичность поведения индивидов. Научные исследования экономического факультета. Электронный журнал. 2021;13(1):52-81. https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2021-13-1-52-81
For citation:
Kudryavtseva O.V., Kulikov P.A., Kulikova A.O., Fokina V.V. The Influence of Social Capital on Pro-environmental Behavior of Individuals. Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal. 2021;13(1):52-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2021-13-1-52-81
Просмотров:
410
Послать статью по эл. почте 