Meso-Economics Through an Ecosystem Approach
https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2024-16-2-7-30
Abstract
The evolution of economic theory leads to the need to move away from the usual dichotomy of micro- and macroeconomics and to define a new level in the hierarchy of economic knowledge - meso-economy. Despite extensive discussions among scientists, a consensus on the content of mesoeconomics as a new economic paradigm has not yet emerged. The article carried out a retrospective review of scientific works, as a result of the content analysis of which the main approaches to the determination of meso-level components were classified. A regional ecosystem model has been developed, which includes groups of key and supporting organizations, that taking into account the heterogeneity and multidimensional environment in which they operate. The obtained results will make it possible to supplement the approaches to the analysis of the meso-level, as a complex hierarchical structure, and to study the social and economic processes taking into account their systemic and non-linearity.
About the Author
A. A. Melikyan
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ani A. Melikyan, Graduate Student of the Department of Micro- and Macroeconomic Analysis, Engineer of International Corporate Reporting Laboratory, Faculty of Economics
Moscow
References
1. Akhmadiev B.A., Moiseev A.N. Innovatsionnaya ekosistema kak klyuchevoy faktor regional'nogo razvitiya. Vestnik REU im. G.V. Plekhanova. 2016. No. 4 (88). P. 145–154.
2. Basova A.G., Karamova O.V. Vliyanie sovremennogo razvitiya zdravookhraneniya na ekonomiku Rossii // Problemy nauki. 2017. No. 2. P. 121–128.
3. Gareev T.R. Regional'nyy institutsionalizm: terra incognita ili terra ficta? Journal of Institutional Studies (Zhurnal institutsional'nykh issledovaniy). 2010. No. 2.P. 27–37.
4. Gel'vanovskiy M.I., Zhukovskaya V.M., Trofimova I.A., Konkurentosposobnost' v mikro-, mezo- i makroekonomicheskom izmerenii. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 1998. No. 37 P. 67–75.
5. Karaban L.A. Rol' logistiki v ekonomike i organizatsii. Transportnoe mashinostroenie. 2016. No. 5 (53). P. 180–192.
6. Kirdina-Chendler S.G., Maevskiĭ V.I. Mezouroven' ekonomicheskogo analiza: nekotorye voprosy metodologii. Mezoekonomika: sostoyanie i perspektivy. 2018. No. 3. P. 66–87.
7. Kuz'mina Yu.I. Vliyanie tsifrovizatsii na transformatsiyu bankovskoy sistemy Rossii. Pravo, ekonomika i upravlenie: aktual'nye voprosy. Materialy Vseross. nauch.-prakt. konf. s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Cheboksary, 21 iyulya 2020 g.). 2020. P. 18–24. DOI 10.31483/r-86072.
8. Markova L.S., Yagol'nitser M.A. Mezoekonomicheskie sistemy: problemy tipologii. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya. 2008. No.1. P. 18–44.
9. Mal'ko A.V. Vliyanie tsifrovizatsii na effektivnost' bankovskogo kreditovaniya v RF. E-scio. 2021. No. 3 (24). P. 25–31.
10. Mezoekonomika perekhodnogo perioda: rynki, otrasli, predpriyatiya: monografiya. Pod red. G.B. Kleynera. M.: Nauka, 2001.
11. Mezoekonomika razvitiya: monografiya. pod red. G.B. Kleynera. M.: Nauka, 2011.
12. Mezoekonomika Rossii: strategiya razbega: monografiya. Pod red. G.B. Kleynera. M.: ID «Nauchnaya biblioteka», 2022.
13. Nazybina V.A., Kuz'menko N.I., Vliyanie tsifrovizatsii na razvitie logisticheskikh protsessov rossiyskikh predpriyatiy. Territoriya nauki. 2022. No. 2. P. 34–38.
14. Onopyuk E.Yu., Shakhova I.Yu. Razvitie ekonomiki regiona kak biznes-ekosistemy. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii. 2022. No. 1 (22). P. 6–12.
15. Piroglanov Sh.Sh. Tsifrovizatsiya v obrazovanii: problemnyy aspekt v kontekste global'noy transformatsii. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya 2019. No. 2 (52). P. 155– 159.
16. Sentishcheva E.A. Tsifrovizatsiya i ee vliyanie na razvitie professional'nogo obrazovaniya. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2022. No. 2. P. 21–28.
17. Solov'eva T.S. Teoreticheskie aspekty formirovaniya i razvitiya regional'nykh innovatsionnykh ekosistem. Vestnik NIGEI. 2019. No. 3 (94). P. 32–42.
18. Sukhanova P.A. Innovatsionnaya infrastruktura v regional'noy ekosisteme i ee element. Vestnik Sibirskogo instituta biznesa i informatsionnykh tekhnologiy. 2012. № 3. S. 50–54.
19. Taranukha Yu.V. Stanet li mezoekonomika novym napravleniem v ekonomicheskoy teorii? Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2022. No. 2. P. 259–276.
20. Cherkasova V.A., Slepushenko G.A. Vliyanie tsifrovizatsii biznesa na finansovye pokazateli rossiyskikh kompaniy. Finansy: teoriya i praktika. 2021. No. 25 (2). P. 128–142. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-2-128-142.
21. Shenyagin V.P. Evolyutsiya ekonomicheskoy teorii i rostki garmonii. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. No. 2. P. 25–34.
22. Shul'ts D.N. Ierarkhicheskiy analiz ob"ektov mezoekonomicheskogo urovnya. Regional'nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki. 2011. No. 3. P. 21–28.
23. Appioa F.P., Limab M., Paroutisc S. Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019. No. 142. P. 1–14.
24. Cole A.H. Meso-economics: a contribution from entrepreneurial history. Explorations in Entrepre-neurial History. 1968. No. 6 (1). P. 3–33.
25. Dopfer K., Potts J., Why evolutionary realism underpins evolutionary economic analysis and theory: A reply to Runde’s critique. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2010. No. 6 (3). P. 401–413.
26. Dopfer K. The origins of meso economics. Schumpeter’s legacy and beyond. Journal of Evlutionary Economics. 2012. No. 22 (1). P. 133–160.
27. Dopfer K., Potts J. The General theory of economic evolution. London: Routledge, 2008.
28. Elsner W., Heinrich T. A simple theory of «meso». On the co-evolution of institutions and platform size – With an application to varieties of capitalism and «medium-sized» countries. The Journal of Socio-economics. 2009. No. 38. P. 843–858.
29. Guzman J., Murray F., Stern S., Williams H.L. Accelerating Innovation Ecosystems: The Promise and Challenges of Regional Innovation Engines. NBER Working Paper. 2023. No. 31541. P. 43–54.
30. Li W., Chang J., Wang M.J. Innovation 3.0 and innovation ecosystem. Stud. Sci. 2014. No. 32. P. 1761–1770.
31. Menard C. Embedding organizational arrangements: towards a general model. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2014. No 10. P. 567–589. DOI:10.1017/S1744137414000228.
32. Ménard C., Jimenez A., Tropp H. Addressing the policy-implementation gaps in water services: the key role of meso-institutions. Water Int. 2018. No. 43 (1). P. 13–33.
33. Moore J.F. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review. 1993. No. 71. P. 75–86.
34. Ng Y.-K. A micro-macroeconomic analysis based on a representative firm . Economica. 1982. No. 49 (194). P. 121–139.
35. Pidorycheva I., Shevtsova H, Antonyuk V., Shvets N., Pchelynska H. A Conceptual Framework for Developing of Regional Innovation Ecosystems. European Journal of Sustainable Development. 2020. No. 9. P. 626–646. DOI:10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n3p626.
36. Runde J. Ontology and the Foundations of evolutionary economic theory: on Dopfer and Pott’s, general Theory of Economic Evolution. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2009. No 5 (3). P. 361–378.
37. Stewart F. Can adjustment programmes incorporate the interests of women? Women’s Studies at York. 1992. P. 13–45.
38. Wittfogel K.A. Agrarian problems and the Moscow-peking axis. Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1992. No. 21 (4). P. 678–698.
39. Bank Rossii «Osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya finansovgo rynka Rossiyskoy Federatsii na 2022 god i period 2023 i 2024 godov»: Available at: https://www.cbr.ru/about_br/publ/onfinmarket/ (accessed: 10.03.2024).
Review
For citations:
Melikyan A.A. Meso-Economics Through an Ecosystem Approach. Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal. 2024;16(2):7-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2024-16-2-7-30
Views:
65
Email this article 