Regulated Procurement as an Instrument of Economic Policy
https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2024-16-3-21-34
Abstract
The paper is devoted to using the procurement regulated procurement as the instrument of the economic policy structural component. The paper emphasizes that public procurement sector, traditionally being a component of macroeconomic policy, also has the potential to solve many problems within the framework of structurally determined development of the national economy. Based on an analysis of policy documents at both the national and international levels, economic policy programs that are actively and successfully implemented in world practice through public sector procurement are highlighted. Special attention is paid to the mechanisms used to stimulate innovation activity through the procurement system, and some problematic aspects of this area in Russian practice are highlighted.
About the Author
L. S. Plekhanova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lidia S. Plekhanova, Junior Researcher, Faculty of Economics
Moscow
References
1. Andreev M.Yu., Polbin A.V. Vliyanie fiskal'noy politiki na makroekonomicheskie pokazateli v DSGE-modelyakh. Finansovyy zhurnal. 2018. No. 3 (43). P. 21–33. (In Russ.).
2. Mel'nikov V.V., Karelin I.N. Gosudarstvennye zakupki kak instrument ekonomicheskoy poli-tiki. Journal of Institutional Studies (Zhurnal institutsional'nykh issledovaniy). 2021 No. 13.2. P. 100–115. (In Russ.).
3. Shadrina E.V., Romodina I.V. Gosudarstvennye zakupki dlya ustoychivogo razvitiya: mezhdunarodnyy opyt. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya. 2017. No. 1. P. 149–172. (In Russ.).
4. Shteĭn V.M. Ekonomicheskaya politika. Petrograd, 1922. (In Russ.).
5. Amann M., Essig M. Public procurement of innovation: empirical evidence from EU public authorities on barriers for the promotion of innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 2015. No. 28 (3). P. 282–292.
6. Arrowsmith S. The purpose of the EU procurement directives: ends, means and the implications for national regulatory space for commercial and horizontal procurement policies. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. 2012. No. 14. P. 1–47.
7. Arrowsmith S. Transparency in Government Procurement – The Objectives of Regulation and the Boundaries of the WTO.J. World Trade. 2003. No. 37. P. 282.
8. Blome C., Hollos D., Paulraj A. Green procurement and green supplier development: antecedents and effects on supplier performance. International Journal of Production Research. 2014. No. 52.1. P. 32–49.
9. Brammer S., Walker H. Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 2011. No. 31(4). P. 452–476.
10. Chersan I.C., Dumitru V.F., Gorgan C., Gorgan V. Green public procurement in the academic literature // Amfiteatru Economic. 2020. No. 53. P. 82–101.
11. Choi J.W. A study of the role of public procurement – Can public procurement make society better. In The International Public Procurement Conference. Seoul, South Korea, 2010.
12. De Rassenfosse G., Jaffe A., Raiteri E. The procurement of innovation by the US government. PloS one. 2019. No. 14 (8). e0218927.
13. Edquist C., Hommen L. Public technology procurement and innovation theory. Public technology procurement and innovation (Boston, MA: Springer US). 2000. P. 5–70.
14. Evenett S.J., Hoekman B.M. Government procurement: market access, transparency, and multilateral trade rules. European Journal of Political Economy. 2005. No. 21.1 P. 163–183.
15. Iossa E., Biagi F., Valbonesi P. Pre-commercial procurement, procurement of innovative solutions and innovation partnerships in the EU: rationale and strategy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2018. No. 27 (8). P. 730–749.
16. Jimenez M.J., Lopez H.M., Escobar F.S.E. Sustainable public procurement: From law to practice. Sustainability. 2019. No. 11 (22). P. 63–88.
17. Kattel R., Lember V. Public procurement as an industrial policy tool: an option for developing countries? Journal of public procurement. 2010. No. 10 (3). P. 368–404.
18. Kopcke R., Tootell G., Triest R. The macroeconomics of fiscal policy. The MIT Press. 2006. Vol. 1.
19. Snyder M., Hoyt K., Gouglas D., Johnston T., Robinson J. Designing Pull Funding for a COVID-19 Vaccine. Health Affairs. 2020. No. 39 (9). P. 1633–1642.
20. Sönnichsen S.D., Clement J. Review of green and sustainable public procurement: Towards circular public procurement. Journal of cleaner production. 2020. No. 245. 118901.
21. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia J.M. Fostering regional innovation, entrepreneurship and growth through public procurement. Small Business Economic. - 2022. No. 58. P. 1205–1222. DOI:10.1007/s11187-021-00466-9.
22. Zhao Yu. Research and Implications on OECD Governments’ Procurement Policy to Promote Technology Innovation. International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies. 2019. No. 5 (1). P. 15–22.
Review
For citations:
Plekhanova L.S. Regulated Procurement as an Instrument of Economic Policy. Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal. 2024;16(3):21-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2024-16-3-21-34
Views:
55
Email this article 