Financial Constraints and Investment Activity: An Assessment Using the Kaplan-Zingales Index
https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2025-17-3-197-213
Abstract
The availability of long-term financing is critically important for investment development, particularly in conditions of high volatility and systematic risk. The Kaplan-Zingales Index (KZ Index) is widely used to assess corporate financial constraints, especially concerning long-term projects, including investments in research and development (R&D). However, its dynamics in the Russian economy remain insufficiently studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate the dynamics of financial constraints faced by Russian publicly traded companies in the context of their ability to finance long-term investments. The empirical analysis is based on financial reporting data and publicly available market indicators for the period 2009–2024. The prolonged decline in the median KZ Index for publicly listed non-financial companies indicates a significant easing of financial barriers for large businesses between 2009 and 2022. However, in 2022–2024, financial capacity stagnated, particularly in the oil and gas sector, which holds the largest weight in the Russian stock market. Additionally, sectoral differences in the dynamics of financial constraints were identified: specific trends were observed in the oil and gas and metallurgical industries, highlighting the need for further analysis.
About the Authors
G. A. BobkovRussian Federation
Gleb A. Bobkov, Postgraduate student, Faculty of Economics
Moscow
G. M. Magomedova
Russian Federation
Gumay M. Magomedova, Master’s student
Moscow
References
1. Луценко С.И. Источники и цена финансирования (инвестирования) российских компаний в условиях финансового кризиса // Финансовый менеджмент. 2011. № 1. С. 54–61.
2. Цителадзе Д.Д. Анализ влияния корпоративного венчурного финансирования на развитие инновационных проектов на предприятии // Российский журнал управления проектами. 2024. № 3. С. 10–20. https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6279-2024-13-3-10-20
3. Akerlof G. The Market for «Lemons»: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1970. No. 84 (3). P. 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
4. Arqué-Castells P., Mohnen P., Spinesi L. Sunk Costs, Extensive R&D Subsidies and Permanent Inducement Effects // SSRN Electronic Journal. 2015. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2694873
5. Baker M.P., Wurgler J.A., Stein J.C. When does the market matter? Stock prices and the investment of equity-dependent firms // NBER Working Paper. 2002. No. w8750. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8750
6. Bloch C. R&D Investment and Internal Finance: The Cash Flow Effect // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2004. No. 13 (3). P. 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000312710
7. Bond S., Harhoff D., Van Reenen J. Investment, R&D and Financial Constraints in Britain and Germany // Annales d'Économie et de Statistique. 2005. No. 79/80. P. 433–460. https://doi.org/10.2307/20777584
8. Brown J., Fazzari S., Petersen B. Financing Innovation and Growth: Cash Flow, External Equity, and the 1990s R&D Boom // Journal of Finance. 2009. No. 64 (1). P. 151–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01431.x
9. Cincera M., Ravet J. Financing Constraints and R&D Investments of Large Corporations in Europe // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2010. No. 19 (5). P. 459–483. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X508642
10. Fazzari S., Hubbard R., Petersen B. Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment // Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1998. No. 1. P. 141–206.
11. Gilchrist S., Himmelberg C. Evidence on the Role of Cash Flow for Investment // Journal of Monetary Economics. 1995. No. 36 (3). P. 541–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(95)01223-0
12. Guariglia A., Yang J. A balancing act: Managing financial constraints and agency costs to minimize investment inefficiency in the Chinese market // Journal of Corporate Finance. 2016. Vol. 36. P. 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.006
13. Hadlock C., Pierce J. New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints // Journal of Finance. 2010. No. 65(5). P. 1705–1725. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq009
14. Hall B. The Financing of Research and Development // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2002. No. 18 (1). P. 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/18.1.35
15. Hall B., Lerner J. The Financing of R&D and Innovation // Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. 2010. No. 1. P. 609–639. https://doi.org/10.3386/w15325
16. Kaplan S., Zingales L. Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints? // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1997. No. 112 (1). P. 169–215.
17. Lamont O., Polk C., Saá-Requejo J. Financial Constraints and Stock Returns // Review of Financial Studies. 2001. No. 14 (2). P. 529–554. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/14.2.529
18. Whited T., Wu, G. Financial Constraints Risk // Review of Financial Studies. 2006. No. 19 (2). P. 531–559. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhj012
19. Stiglitz J.E., Weiss A. Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information // The American Economic Review. 1981. No. 71(3). P. 393–410.
20. Группа НЛМК. Агентство MSCI ESG Research повысило ESG-рейтинг Группы НЛМК: URL: https://nlmk.com/ru/media-center/press-releases/msci-esg-research-upgrades-nlmk-s-esg-rat-ing/ (дата обращения: 18.03.2025).
21. Национальное рейтинговое агентство. ESG-рэнкинг российских компаний промышленного сектора: URL: https://www.ra-national.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/esg-rjenking-ros-sijskih-kompanij-promyshlennogo-sektora-22.01.2024____.pdf (дата обращения: 21.03.2025).
22. RAEX-Аналитика. ESG-профили компаний горнодобывающей и металлургической отрасли: URL: https://raex-rr.com/ESG/ESG_companies/metallurgy_mining/2025/analytics (дата обращения: 12.03.2025).
Review
For citations:
Bobkov G.A., Magomedova G.M. Financial Constraints and Investment Activity: An Assessment Using the Kaplan-Zingales Index. Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal. 2025;17(3):197-213. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2025-17-3-197-213















