Preview

Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal

Advanced search

SOCIAL-DEMOGRAFICANDCULTURALDIVERSITYINTHE WORKFORCE: RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES

https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2017-9-4-52-70

Abstract

Social-demographic and cultural diversityis an important trend in the modern labor market and has a significant impact on social and labor relations within heterogeneous groups. The research in this area has ambiguous results. Positive effects (opportunities) are associated with a diversity of knowledge, perspectives and approaches to problem-solving within the group, which stimulates creativity and creates a favorable environment for innovation. Negative effects (risks) arise as a result of segregation in the labor market, as a backfire to anti-discrimination measures, and as a result of intra-group conflicts that reduce the group performance and satisfaction with teamwork. Diversity can exist not only on the interpersonal (intra-group) level, but also on the intrapersonal level. Intrapersonal diversity that results from diverse life and professional experience contributes to the accumulation of human and social capital, boosts creativity, and helps individuals to interact effectively with other members of the working group.

About the Author

Olga Ivanova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Bantet K.A., Jackson S.E. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? // Strategic Management Journal. 1989. 10. Р. 107-124.

2. Barbulescu R., Bidwell M. Do Women Choose Different Jobs from Men? Mechanisms of Application Segregation in the Market for Managerial Workers// Organization Science. 2013. Vol. 24. Issue 3. Р. 737-757.

3. Brands R.A., Fernandez-Mateo I. Leaning Out: How Negative Recruitment Experiences Shape Women’s Decisions to Compete for Executive Roles// Administrative Science Quarterly. 2017. Vol. 62 (3). Р. 405-442.

4. Castilla E.J., Benard S. The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations// Administrative Science Quarterly. 2010. 55. Р. 543-576.

5. Chen F.F., Kenrick D.T. Repulsion or attraction? Group membership and assumed attitude similarity// Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. 83. Р. 111-125.

6. Dobbin F., Schrage D., Kalev A. Rage against the Iron Cage: The Varied Effects of Bureaucratic Personnel Reforms on Diversity// American Sociological Review. 2015. Vol. 80(5). Р. 1014-1044.

7. Fernandez-Mateo I., Kind Z. Anticipatory Sorting and Gender Segregation in Temporary Employment// Management Science. 2011. Vol. 57. No. 6. Р. 989-1008.

8. Galinsky A.D., Todd A.R., Homan A.C., Phillips K.W., Apfelbaum E.P., Sasaki S.J., Richeson J.A., Olayon J.B., Maddux W.W. Maximizing the Gains and Minimizing the Pains of Diversity: A Policy Perspective// Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2015. Vol. 10(6). Р. 742 -748.

9. Godart F.C., Muddux W.W., Shipilov A.V., Galinsky A.D. Fashion with a foreign flair: professional experience abroad facilitate the creative innovations of organization// Academy of Management Journal. 2015. Vol. 58. No. 1. Р. 195-220.

10. Hargadon A., Sutton R. I. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm// Administrative science quarterly. 1997. 42. Р. 716-749.

11. Hays Gender Diversity Report, 2016.

12. Jackson S.E., Brett I.F., Sessa V.I., Cooper D.M., lulin J.A., Peyronnin K. Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover// Journal of Applied Psychology. 1991. 76. Р. 675-689.

13. Jehn K.A., Northcraft G.B., Neale M.A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups// Administrative Science Quarterly. 1999. 44. Р. 741-763.

14. Leung A.K., Maddux W.W., Galinsky A.D., Chiu C. Multicultural Experience Enhances Creativity: The When and How// American Psychologist. 2008. Vol. 63. No. 3. Р. 169-181.

15. McLeod P.L., Lobel S.A. The effects of ethnic diversity on idea generation in small groups// Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings. 1992. Р. 227-231.

16. Milliken F.J., Martins L.L. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups// Academy of Management Review. 1996. 1396. Vol. 21. No. 2. Р. 402-433.

17. Monin B., Miller D.T. Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice// Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001. 81. Р. 33-43.

18. Nemeth C.J., Wachtler J. Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs minority influence// European Journal of Social Psychology. 1982. 13. Р. 45-55.

19. O'Reilly C.A., Caldwell D.F., Bamett W.P. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover// Administrative Science Quarterly. 1989. 34. Р. 21-37.

20. O’Reilly C.A., Williams K.Y., Barsade S. The impact of relational demography on teamwork: when difference make a difference// Academy of Management Proceedings & Membership Directory. 1999. P. G1-G6.

21. Reagans R., Zuckerman E., McEvily B. How to Make the Team: Social Networks vs. Demography as Criteria for Designing Effective Teams// Administrative Science Quarterly. 2004. 49 (1). Р. 101-33.

22. Rivera L.A., Tilcsik A. Class Advantage, Commitment Penalty: The Gendered Effect of Social Class Signals in an Elite Labor Market// American Sociological Review. 2016. Vol. 81 (6). Р. 1097-1131.

23. Simons T. Top management team consensus, heterogeneity, and debate as contingent predictors of company performance: The complimentarity of group structure and process// Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings. 1995. Р. 62-66.

24. Tadmor C.T., Galinsky A.D., Maddux W.W. Getting the Most Out of Living Abroad: Biculturalism and Integrative Complexity as Key Drivers of Creative and Professional Success// Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012. Vol. 103. Issue 3.

25. Tsui A.S., O'Reilly C.A. Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads// Academy of Management Journal. 1989. 32. Р. 402-423.

26. Watson W.E., Kumar K., Michaelsen L.K. Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups// Academy of Management Journal. 1993.36. Р. 590-602.

27. Wiersema M.F., Bantel K.A. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change// Academy of Management Journal. 1992. 35. Р. 91-121.

28. World Economic Forum, The Global Gender Gap Report, 2017.

29. Zuckerman Ezra W., Tai-Young Kim, Kalinda Ukanwa, James von Rittmann. Robust Identities or Nonentities? Typecasting in the Feature-Film Labor Market// American Journal of Sociology. 2003. 108. Р. 1018-74.

30. База данных Росстат. Занятое население по полу и группам занятий на основной работе, 2015, URL: www.gks.ru (дата обращения: 02.12.2017)

31. База данных Eurostat. Employment growth and activity branches, 2014. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (датао бращения: 02.12.2017)

32. База данных Normlex. Ratification by Convention. URL: www.ilo.org (дата обращения: 09.08.18)


Review

For citations:


Ivanova O. SOCIAL-DEMOGRAFICANDCULTURALDIVERSITYINTHE WORKFORCE: RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES. Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal. 2017;9(4):52-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2017-9-4-52-70

Views: 276


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-3809 (Online)