A.A. Bogdanov and Modern Economic Theory: Movement to Systematization
https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2024-16-4-148-157
Abstract
The idea of systematizing the space of modern economic theory using the methods and principles of universal organizational science (tektology) of A. Bogdanov has been formulated. Reliance on the statements of A. Bogdanov in combination with the provisions of systems economic theory and space-time analysis allows us to outline the path to cataloging variants (units) of economic theory. The choice of the space-time universe within which the indicated options should be located is of particular importance. The universal approach of A. Bogdanov, based on the concept of ingression as a universal connection of material, social and spiritual components, opens the way to the integration of research in all four spheres of existence - ontological, ideological, epistemological and praxeological, which, in turn, allows us to systematize options in the future economic theory in accordance with their ontological, ideological, epistemological and praxeological characteristics.
About the Author
G. B. Kleiner
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (CEMI RAS); Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
George B. Kleiner, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Scientific Department “Mesoeconomics, microeconomics, corporate economics”, Scientific director of the Department of System Analysis in Economics, Head of the Department of Institutional Economics
Moscow
References
1. Avtonomov V.S. «Drugoy kanon» v istorii ekonomicheskoy mysli. Finansy i real'nyy sektor: vzaimodeystvie i konkurentsiya. Materialy IX Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma po evolyutsionnoy ekonomike. 8–10 sentyabrya 2011 g. Rossiya, Moskovskaya obl., g. Pushchino / pod red. V.I. Maevskogo, S.G. Kirdinoy. M.: Institut ekonomiki RAN, 2012; SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, 2013. P. 57–67. (In Russ.).
2. Balatskiy E.V. Novye imperativy ekonomicheskogo znaniya: na puti k sotsionomike. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo. 2022. Vol. 8. No. 4. DOI: 10.15838/sa.2022.4.36.2. (In Russ.).
3. Blaug M. Metodologiya ekonomicheskoy nauki, ili Kak ekonomisty ob"yasnyayut / Per. s angl. Yu.V. Avtonomova; pod red. V.S. Avtonomova. 2-e izd. M.: Voprosy ekonomiki, 2004. 415 p.
4. Bogdanov A.A. Tektologiya: Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka / Pod red. V.V. Popkova (otv. red.) i dr. Sost., predislovie i kommentarii G.D. Gloveli. Posleslovie V.V. Popkova. M.: «Finansy», 2003. (In Russ.).
5. Bogdanov A.A. Tektologiya: Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka. Ch. 1 i 2, zanovo pererabot. i dop. i ch. 3. Berlin i dr.: Z.I. Grzhebin, 1922. (In Russ.).
6. Kleyner G.B. Razmyshlenie o sistemnom myshlenii: mezhdu A. Bogdanovym i L. fon Bertalanfi. AlterEconomics. 2024a. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 20–28. DOI: 10.31063/AlterEconomics/2024.21-1.3. (In Russ.).
7. Kleyner G.B. Rasshiryayushchayasya vselennaya ekonomicheskoy teorii. AlterEconomics. 2023a. T. 20. № 1. S. 1–8. DOI: /10.31063/AlterEconomics/2023.20-1.1. (In Russ.).
8. Kleyner G.B. Sistemnaya metodologiya Aleksandra Bogdanova v kontekste sovremennogo ekonomicheskogo mirovozzreniya. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2023b. No. 3. P. 24–39. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2023-3-24-39. (In Russ.).
9. Kleyner G.B. Sistemnaya filosofiya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo prostranstva-vremeni. Mirovozzrencheskie voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii: sovremennost' i svoevremennost': monografiya / Pod red. A.G. Gryaznovoy, M.L. Al'pidovskoy. M.: KNORUS, 2024b. S. 120–131. (In Russ.).
10. Kleyner G.B. Evolyutsiya vedushchikh paradigm sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy nauki. Institutsional'naya ekonomika i sovremennoe upravlenie. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom GUU, 2016. P.10–30. (In Russ.).
11. Kleyner G.B. Ekosistemnyy podkhod kak magistral'naya liniya razvitiya ekonomiki v epokhu tsifrovizatsii. Razvitie ekosistemnogo podkhoda v kontseptakh i terminakh novoy ekonomiki: monografiya / Pod red. M.A. Borovskoy i dr. Rostov-na-Donu; Taganrog: Izdatel'stvo Yuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta, 2021. P. 13–19. (In Russ.).
12. Matveev V.V., Ovchinnikova A.V. Teoriya «chernogo lebedya» i krizis sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy teorii. Zhiznesposobnost' ekonomicheskikh teoriy: proverka poryadkom i khaosom: sb. nauch. st. / Pod red. Yu.G. Lavrikovoy, Yu.G. Myslyakovoy, O.N. Buchinskoy. Ekaterinburg: Institut ekonomiki UrO RAN, 2022. P. 65–78. (In Russ.).
13. Nureev R. M. Razvitie metoda ekonomicheskoy teorii. Mir novoy ekonomiki. 2014. No. 3. P. 95–106. (In Russ.).
14. Polterovich V.M. Krizis ekonomicheskoy teorii. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii. 1998. No. 1. P. 46–66. (In Russ.).
15. Raynert E. Kak bogatye strany stali bogatymi i pochemu bednye strany ostayutsya bednymi. M.: VShE (GU), 2011. 384 s. (In Russ.).
16. Frolov D.P. Evolyutsionnaya ekonomika na pike i v krizise: perspektiva novoy paradigm. Journal of Institutional Studies (Zhurnal institutsional'nykh issledovaniy). 2020. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 19–37. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2020.12.1.019-037. (In Russ.).
17. Khudokormov A.G., Nelyubina A.S., Safina M.A., Andronova E.S., Temirbulatova K.Yu. Novye shtudii po sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy teorii zapada. Nauchnye issledovaniya ekonomicheskogo fakul'teta. Elektronnyy zhurnal. 2018. Vol. 10. No. 1 (27). P. 7–73. (In Russ.).
18. Bertalanffy L. von. General System Theory. General Systems. 1956. Vol. 1. P. 1–10.
Review
For citations:
Kleiner G.B. A.A. Bogdanov and Modern Economic Theory: Movement to Systematization. Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal. 2024;16(4):148-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2024-16-4-148-157
Views:
41
Email this article 