The language of economic science is the backbone of its theory and practice: it describes economic reality and prescribes certain actions to deal with it. In addition, language is the basis of communication between representatives of various theories and approaches within the framework of economic science, and between economists and representatives of other sciences. Therefore, the eco-nomic language must be learned. The purpose of the article is to determine the most promising ap-proach to studying the language of economic science. Tasks of the research: 1) Define the concept of "language of economic science". 2) Compare the main approaches to learning the language of eco-nomics. 3) Determine the relationship of the language of economic science with its theory and prac-tice. The comparative method and the systematic approach were used in the research. We have iden-tified three main approaches to the study of economic language: terminological, economic, and phil-osophical. Terminology draws attention to the term as the main unit of the system of economic knowledge, economics analyzes the language as a resource, and only philosophy gives a holistic analysis of the language, highlighting its ontological and epistemological aspects, which allows us to raise the question of the nature of economic science and connect its language with the languages of other sciences.

Article is designed to expand the course on the history of the national economy through the introduction of global topics (in addition to sections on the development of individual countries and regions). The article deals with the spasmodic development of world industry in the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries. Data are given on the rapid development of the electric power industry and electrical engineering, metallurgy, various means of transport (cars, aircraft, etc.), as well as types of weapons. In conclusion, a general analysis of the social changes caused by the Second In-dustrial Revolution in the most developed, technically advanced countries of the world is presented.

The article presents the prerequisites for the formation and analysis of the feasibility of de-veloping and putting into practice the «Standard of well-being», its basic provisions. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the formation of a «Standard of well-being». The work is based on scientific and practical developments in the field of regulating the quality of life of citi-zens. The conducted research has shown that the «Standard of Well-being» can become a support for state policy in ensuring a decent and undiminished quality of life for the population of the Russian Federation, the realization of the inalienable constitutional rights of citizens, economic development, improving the efficiency and accessibility of public services, regardless of the subject of the federa-tion.

In the article, based on the experience of implementing the principles of lean manufacturing and the Kaizen ideology at industrial enterprises, as well as on the basis of the work of a number of specialists in the organization of production, steps are proposed to improve the efficiency of the pro-duction of sandwich panels for special vehicles, proposals are formulated for the introduction of a number of lean manufacturing tools and formed an idea of the potential effect of the implementation of the proposed measures at the stage of production start-up.

The review examines A. Genovesi's book «Lectures on Civil Economy» as an example of the concept of cameralism against the backdrop of the socio-economic thought of the transition period from feudalism to capitalism.

An overview of the discussion held on October 19, 2022 in hybrid format at the Faculty of Economics at Lomonosov Moscow State University at the theoretical seminar «Debatable problems of modern social and economic thought» on the topic: «The era of cancellation and the burden of humanitarian timelessness», dedicated to V.A. Kutyrev memory. Economists, philosophers, historians, political scientists who took part in the seminar presented a range of opinions on the «era of cancellation» prevailing in the Euro-American world and the state of modern humanities